This report shows the baseline and robustness results from the empirical exercise in the paper “Do local and foreign newspapers unveil the same economic policy uncertainty shocks?” by E. Andres-Escayola, C. Ghirelli, L. Molina, J.J. Perez, and E. Vidal. In particular, here we report the impulse response functions from the Bayesian VAR model. Please refer to the paper for specific details.
Prepared by E. Andres-Escayola
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 90%-10%, 84%-16%, 68%-32% credible sets for 15 periods.
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods (filled triangles represent significant estimates).
IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The baseline (base) results include the common factor and the idiosyncratic (idio) results exclude the common factor. The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. The local press corresponds to the red chart, the Spanish to the black one, and the Anglo-saxon to the blue one. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible sets for 15 periods.
BR IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
BR IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
BR IRFs to EPU shocks
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.
(Percentage points)
Source: Own estimations.
Note: The first chart corresponds to the response of the financial variable and the second to the response of GDP. Both responses are with respect to a 1 STD shock of the EPU. We report the median response with the corresponding 84%-16% credible set for 15 periods.